Thursday
May262016

Center Chair Benjamin Ginsberg receives Teaching Award

Dr. Benjamin Ginsberg, Chair of the JHU Center for Advanced Governmental Studies and the David Bernstein Professor of Political Science, is the recipient of the Johns Hopkins University 2016 George E. Owen Teaching Award.  He also received the award in 2000.  

This award was established by the 1982 Student Council to honor George E. Owen, who was dean of the Homewood Faculties. It is awarded annually by the Student Council for outstanding teaching and devotion to undergraduates. The award may be given to a faculty member in either the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences or the Whiting School of Engineering.

Congratulations to Dr. Ginsberg!

Wednesday
May252016

Congratulations 2015- 2016 Graduates!

Dr. Ben Ginsberg addresses students, families and facultyCongratulations to the JHU Center for Advanced Governmental Studies Graduates.  We had 107 students this past year earning their masters degrees and certificates.  It was a great weekend of celebrations, starting with our Center graduation reception on Sunday and the AAP graduation ceremony in Baltimore on Monday.  We are so proud of all our graduates and hope you will be active alumni!

 

Andrea Hill, one of the first students who matriculated through the Government Analystics Masters Program is congratulated by Dr. Ginsberg. Here is a listing of the awards that were given at our reception on Sunday:

 

The Harold Seidman Award

Jill Khoury, "Contingent Convertible Capital:  A New Capital Requirement to Sovle Too Big to Fail"

Rowan Braybrook, "Payment for Environmental Services:  Sustainable Development of Water Resources in Rwanda"

The William F. Clinger, Jr. Award

Douglas Andres, "Congress and Why Process Matters"

Best Masters Thesis in the Area of Governance and Technology

Charles Yarborough, "Silicon Valley as a Political Institution:  Its Birth and Influence in the 21st Century"

Best Masters Thesis in the Area of Case Study Analysis

Matthew Coughlin, "Changing the Face of Society:  Biometrics, Convenience, and Privacy"

Best Masters Thesis in the Area of Global Studies

Michael Hughes, "Afhanistan's Troika of Instability:  Political Illegitimacy, State-Building, and Pakistani Realpolitik"

Best Masters Thesis in the Area of Strategic Studices

Kathryn Grant, "The Health of the Force:  Mental Health Care Implications for Readiness and Strategic Planning"

Student Service Award

Sonali Brahmbhatt and Maurice Urbain

Excellence in Teaching and Mentoring

Dorothea Israel Wolfson


 Dorothea Wolfson receives the Teaching and Mentoring Award from Dr. Ginsberg

Wednesday
Apr132016

Facial Recognition Technology: Notes of Caution for Privacy, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

This month's Government Analytics Breakfast Forum featured Alvaro Bedoya, Clare Garvie and Jonathan Frankle of Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy & Technology for a discussion about the privacy concerns raised by law enforcement's increasing reliance on facial recognition technology.

Facial recognition technology can be used to both verify a person's identify and identify an unknown individual.  It has both positive and negative applications.  For example, many would argue that being able to pay for something with facial recognition would be highly convenient (Google is experimenting with this).  On the other hand, a store owner using facial recognition to target potential shoplifters raises serious concerns about the invasion of privacy and racial profiling.

Racial profiling is, indeed, one of the biggest concerns with increased use of facial recognition technology.  The few studies that have been done demonstrate that existing technologies are significantly less accurate when identifying individuals who are not old, white and/or male.  There are many disturbing implications of inaccurate facial recognition, including the labeling of innocent people as crime suspects.

There are currently very few limits on how law enforcement agencies can use facial recognition.  Going forward, policymakers at both the state and federal should devote attention to developing a legal framework that governs the use of this powerful technology. 

A recording of the event can be viewed here.

 

Thursday
Mar172016

Congratulations to Alum Kristen Soltis Anderson ('2009)

 

Congratulations to Kristen Soltis Anderson who was named by Elle magazine as one of "The Ten Most Compelling Women in DC." The article profile of Kristen includes how working on her thesis for the MA in Government Program provided her with the opportunity to develop further her ground breaking research on the voting preferences of the millenial generation.  

 

Thursday
Mar102016

Jenna Brayton Discusses President Obama's Digital Communication Strategies


Jenna Brayton
, who served as Associate Director of Content for the Obama White House Office of Digital Strategy, addressed a capacity crowd of students at last night’s Symposia.   Her topic was “The First Digital White House:  A YouTube Presidency, Hashtag Activism, and the Significance of the Shift to the Internet.” 

Ms. Brayton shared with the audience the sweeping and swift changes that have taken place in digital communications between the end of the George W. Bush Administration and the onset of Obama’s.  The Bush Administration communicated mainly through “binders” of papers.  For example, Secretary of State under President Bush, Condoleeza Rice said in 2000 that she seldom used her state.gov email address.   Fast forward eight years to the Obama Administration, which was the first administration to have a Digital Strategy office (alongside a Communications Office).   Much of this was driven by vast changes in technology that took place since the Bush years, but also by President Obama’s eagerness to embrace social media.  In fact, Ms. Brayton shared that President Obama has avidly embraced digital platforms to reach a wider base of citizens.  He was the first president with a Twitter account, and he set a world record (broken soon after by Caitlyn Jenner) for establishing one million followers in a little over four hours on Twitter.  

 

Ms. Brayton answers questions after her talk to a prospective studentMs. Brayton discussed how her team in the Digital Strategy Office facilitated President Obama’s desire to have a strong social media presence.  She showed segments of his appearance on YouTube star sites (such as Swoozie and GloZell’s) as well as internet shows such as “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee” with Jerry Seinfeld, and “Between Two Ferns” with Zach Galifianakis.  These internet platforms allowed President Obama to reach a younger demographic of citizens who don’t normally tune into television news shows or read newspapers.  For example, his interview with GloZell in the White House reached her over four million followers.   Another initiative the Digital Strategy Office successfully employed was its $40 hashtag campaign on Obama’s Twitter account to extend the payroll tax cut that Republicans in the House wanted to eliminate (the tax cut amounted to $40 per two week paycheck).   The White House asked its 2.6 million followers what $40 a paycheck meant to them.  The response was overwhelming, with over 2,000 tweets per hour.  The groundswell from Twitter thwarted Republicans efforts to eliminate the payroll tax cut.

 Ms. Brayton shared other examples of the enormous reach that social media has in reaching citizens and how the Office of Digital Strategy continues to think creatively of ways of tapping into diverse social media and internet platforms to advance the President’s agenda.  She also discussed how social media sites are increasingly setting the agenda for the traditional news media to follow.  At the same time, she acknowledged the valid concerns critics have raised about presidential appearances on social media sites.   For example, while Obama’s interview with GloZell may have increased his accessibility and visibility to the people, does it come at the expense of the dignity of the office?   She also engaged the question if raising awareness campaigns on social media (dismissed by critics as “slacktivism”) have the same impact as traditional forms of on-the-ground activism.  These are questions that students were asked to wrestle with themselves  after this very lively and informative talk.